Ninth Doctor Vs War Doctor : Who Plays The Most Intense Doctor In Auton?

Christopher eccleston provides what may transpire to be the most intense doctor, although he plays second-fiddle to billie piper's unexpectedly well-acted rose – who effectively 'saves the day'. the superficial auton plot succeeds in introducing the protagonists, although the situations and scenarios are somewhat so-so. camille coduri and noel clarke's respective acting leaves much to be desired.

The number of deaths is quite surprising; particularly in the case of one character although he does 'recover'. having the doctor send rose away along with a message saying he didn't expect to survive worked well; it showed us just how far each of them was prepared to go to try to save the other. christopher eccleston was on fine form as the doctor; he may only have been in the series for one season but he was a fine first doctor for the new era of the show.

Christopher eccleston excels as the "good guy" on the bad side, a very stringer bell-esque character who takes a business approach to everything. the supporting cast all make huge impressions as well; rafe spall and stephen rea both create two of the most terrifying villains in recent memory. spall the livewire with his finger always on the trigger and rea the calm and mysterious shadow figure hiding behind the door.

"doctor who: paul mcgann regenerates into john hurt in the night of the doctor, a new 6 minute 49 second prequel film". radiotimes.com. retrieved 14 november 2013.

Now, he didn't press the button because the helpless bloodthirsty merciless time lords, on the verge of defeat, have to be saved under the hope of a better day in the future.i also question the necessity of adding the war doctor to the line of doctors possibly requiring a re-con of doctor's lives. i wonder if the script was written with the idea eccleston's 9th doctor would play the john hurt role, prior to eccleston turning it down, which would make more sense. or, alternatively, casting paul mcgann as the last days of the 8th doctor.likewise, i kept wondering why david tennant was there other than to have a multi-doctor episode.

Now, he didn't press the button because the helpless bloodthirsty merciless time lords, on the verge of defeat, have to be saved under the hope of a better day in the future.i also question the necessity of adding the war doctor to the line of doctors possibly requiring a re-con of doctor's lives. i wonder if the script was written with the idea eccleston's 9th doctor would play the john hurt role, prior to eccleston turning it down, which would make more sense. or, alternatively, casting paul mcgann as the last days of the 8th doctor.likewise, i kept wondering why david tennant was there other than to have a multi-doctor episode.

For the reviewer who said that the webisode would be incomprehensible to modern fans, i'm not even a fan and i found it comprehensible. all you really need to know to appreciate it is that paul mcgann was the eighth doctor but only appeared in a tv movie back in 1996.because it's been seventeen years, he's made enough of a physical change for him to look as if he's been hardened or wisened by events. mcgann gets a much better change to acquit himself and remind everybody that he's a very good actor.